Friday, December 21, 2007
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Immanuel Kant: Wrong for America (Vote Nietzsche!)
Hat tip to Hot Air.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Monday, December 10, 2007
Sunday, December 09, 2007
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
Fred Thompson lays down the first principles
I like it when candidates go back to first principles. True conservatism seems only to be found coming from Fred.CHARLIE ROSE: You constantly say in this campaign that you are a conservative. What does that mean today? Is George Bush a conservative?
FRED THOMPSON: Well, let's talk about me. (LAUGHTER) I thought we might get to that. I think that it means things that are consistent with God's design for man. It`s consistent with human nature. It's consistent with the lessons of history and the lessons of the ages. They found form in the Constitution, I think, and what our founding fathers believed. They understand that man can do great and wonderful things, but man is prone to error, and sometimes do terrible things. That too much power in too few hands is a dangerous thing, that power is a corrupting thing.
CHARLIE ROSE: In all of that, you didn`t mention abortion, gay rights — all things that have been part of recent presidential elections.
FRED THOMPSON: Those — well, you`re talking about different things there. Those are issues that are before us, which derive from principles. I don`t consider them to be...
CHARLIE ROSE: Principles.
FRED THOMPSON: ... the first principles. But the principles are what guides you in coming to positions with regard to the issues. You know, the Declaration of Independence said that our basic rights come from God and not from man. The founders talked about, you know, life and liberty and the importance of that. And everything is based on those basic principles. And I take those principles, and you know, for example, I come to a pro-life conclusion there. And when we had issues, you know, for eight years when I was in the United States Senate about whether or not the federal government should be funding, for example, abortion-related activities and things of that nature, you know, the application of those principles in that instance told me the answer was no, properly.